Rule #1 - Never antagonize Aravosis

Ohhh, this is going to get ugly.

AMERICAblog's John Aravosis is angry. He is upset about the president's Rose Garden event, planned for Monday, at which Bush will declare his support for amending the constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. The right wing has begun calling it the MPA, or Marriage Protection Amendment.

Mr. Aravosis wants to know just how sacred marriage really is to all of these Republican protectors of marriage.

We really need to start cataloguing all the actions of the marriage protectors. How many of the supporters of the anti-gay amendment actually stick to their marriage vows? Because the sanctimonious GOPer are really a bunch of hypocrites. They are obsessed with all things gay -- which really is odd. Really odd. Disturbingly odd.

In a subsequent post, he adds:

Next week, I think we really need to start asking how marriage protection is going in the House and Senate as well. After all, we wouldn't want any Senator or Congressmen who have committed adultery, are committing adultery, or ever will commit adultery voting in favor of "protecting marriage" when they refuse to protect it at home. That would be a travesty that no good American could accept.

Note to Republicans: this is not someone you want getting all up into your business. Give Jeff Gannon, nee' James Guckert a call and ask him what it was like to get on the bad side of AMERICAblog. Ask the wireless companies what life was like after Aravosis realized they were making cell phone records available to information brokers.

Seriously, Republicans, if you're having sex with someone or something you shouldn't be having sex with, stop. It's probably already too late to save your reputation, but if you stop now, you can at least say truthfully that you're not doing it anymore once all your dirt gets put out on the street.